Showing posts with label cybercrime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cybercrime. Show all posts

2026-07-10

Who's calling whom?

Image: Wikipedia

"Hello, you're speaking with Peter Flight from HomeBank*. I'd like to go over a few things with you regarding your new mortgage."

So far, so normal — at least if you actually have taken out a new mortgage with that bank. What the customer did find odd, however, was that the bank employee also wanted to go through some contact details for verification purposes. "They're calling me, so surely they know it's me?"

Did you know that phishing doesn't only happen via email and text message, but also over the phone? In that case it's called vishing (with a v for voice), but the goal is the same: to extract information. Suppose that Peter Flight is a criminal. He probably won't open with a mortgage, because there's a good chance his intended victim hasn't applied for one. So he'll start with something more general — a savings account, say, or a bank card.

Suppose his story sounds plausible. He then asks a series of questions of the kind you hear all the time when you call a company or organisation: your address, date of birth, perhaps even your bank account number or national insurance number. Perfectly logical when you're the one calling — though I'm often surprised by how little information they're satisfied with. But when they call you, the situation is quite different.

Why would they need to verify your identity in that case? They have your file right in front of them, and it includes the phone number they're calling. Yes, someone else could theoretically pick up your phone, but in the age of the mobile that's not very likely (back in the day, dear youngsters, you had one telephone in the house — the kind that could only travel as far as its cord would allow). So if someone calls you on behalf of a company and asks for identifying information, you should be on your guard. Because with that information in hand, a criminal can easily call a company and pretend to be you. With all the consequences that entails.

No, when they call you, you need to turn the tables: ask the questions yourself. What's my date of birth? What's my address? What are the last four digits of my bank account number? If they're unwilling — or unable! — to answer, you're better off hanging up. Not sure whether the call might have been legitimate after all? Call the company back using a number you already know or find on their website or in their letters. They'll be able to tell you whether they called you.

But of course I also heard stories from people who had received good old-fashioned phishing, via email. Take the colleague who received a fantastic offer from Amazon: trainers from a well-known brand for £8 instead of £80. If you've ever attended one of my presentations, you'll probably recognise this piece of wisdom: if something seems too good to be true, it usually is. The colleague initially thought the email looked genuine — he was even addressed by his first name. But because something still felt off, he asked AI for help. Verdict: phishing! The main reason, it turned out, was that the Amazon logo was missing. The fact that this was the clincher is worrying, because any half-decent phishing operation invests precisely in look and feel. What would AI have said if the logo had been there?

How did the criminal behind this email know our colleague's name? Because of data breaches — large-scale incidents at well-known companies where vast amounts of data (including email addresses and names) were stolen. The old rule of thumb that the absence of a personal salutation is a red flag — and implicitly that a personal greeting is a green flag — can safely be thrown out.

Whether they're trying to phish, smish, vish or quish** you: outsmart the criminals. Let people like Peter Flight crash and burn thanks to your alertness.

 

*: These names are fictitious.

**: smishing = phishing via text message, vishing via phone, quishing via QR codes.

 

And in the big bad world...

●      the consequences of a cyberattack on the water supply are greater than you might think.

●      Meta may in future analyse your mood.

●      a young hacker tripped over his own hunger.

●      the Dutch government has tightened its cloud policy. [DUTCH]

●      cybersecurity isn't about scaring people.

●      the Japanese military was hit by infected USB drives.

●      cybercriminals love to capitalise on current events.

●      you no longer need to share your phone number to message someone.

●      thousands of cybercriminals have been arrested worldwide.

●      there was a major attack on Microsoft 365 accounts.

●      China is interested in the emails of Western academics.

 

 

2025-11-26

A tempting side hustle

Image from Unsplash

 

“Dear Patrick, I’d like to point out a super interesting high-tech opportunity to you!” Or: “We’re impressed by your profile. How open would you be to learning more?” Those were in my own language, but they also come in English: I’m working on an exciting opportunity for an Information Security Team Lead role. Would you be open to a quick chat this week to discuss further?

Headhunters work on behalf of companies to find candidates for hard-to-fill positions. If I ever wanted to work elsewhere, I wouldn’t even need to start looking; potential employers reach out to me regularly. This mostly happens via LinkedIn, because that’s where your professional profile is up for grabs.

It’s not just companies trying to connect with professionals. Criminal organizations also attempt to recruit new people. Not via LinkedIn, but through platforms like Telegram – a space where criminals feel right at home.

They don’t want you to come and work for them.  In fact, they want you to stay exactly where you are. You only need to do one thing: give them access to your organization’s systems. They’ll handle the rest. Besides an attractive reward, you’ll probably get a few extra days off. Because their ultimate goal is to infect your organization with ransomware. Usually, everything grinds to a halt, and work can’t resume for weeks. Recently, Jaguar Land Rover’s global car production was down for three weeks. The financial damage is estimated in the hundreds of millions. Earlier this year, a German napkin manufacturer had to file for bankruptcy after two weeks of lost revenue.

Cybercriminals need initial access – a digital foot in the door. Phishing is a tried-and-true method, but now active recruitment is happening too. And it’s highly targeted. A certain ransomware gang is currently looking for employees in finance, insurance, and travel. Hospitality, the automotive industry, and oil companies are also on their radar. They’ll tell you not to worry about criminal prosecution because they take great care of their insiders; they promise to handle your login credentials discreetly. According to them, the worst that can happen is you’ll get fired. “Don’t listen to those clueless security people – they have no idea what they’re talking about!”

Handling your login credentials discreetly? Sounds nice, but that’s only half the story. You can’t exactly work anonymously – much of what you do is logged. Logs will show: user xyz performed this action on that date at that time. If there are serious indicators, there are extensive ways to hunt down the suspected culprit. And we’ll gladly use them.

It may look like easy money, but don’t be fooled. You won’t get away with “that wasn’t me” when your user ID is in the logs. That’s exactly why you should never share your password with anyone – not even a colleague. Because what if that colleague falls for a Telegram message and hands over your credentials? Such a reckless move could cost you not only your current job but your future career. Who wants to hire someone who got fired for that reason?

Better listen to the advice of one of those “clueless security people” and steer clear of such practices. If financial trouble tempts you, seek help instead.

Because of a few days off, this blog appears earlier than usual.

And in the big bad world…


…I unfortunately didn’t have time to fill this section this week.

 


2025-08-29

New friends

Image from Unsplash

It was somewhat between a conference and a summer camp: there were lots of people and it was a bit chaotic. On my way from one presentation to the next workshop, I was harassed by a few teenagers; a small scuffle even broke out, during which I put them in their place.

As I continued on my way, I noticed that the boy who had been the most aggressive had slipped a note into my pocket. I wanted to read it only once I was out of their sight, but that was a big mistake. We will never know what message that boy wanted to convey. Because at that moment, the alarm clock went off. And no matter how hard I tried to pick up the thread again, it didn’t work.

Of course, you start fantasizing about the meaning of such a dream, and especially what would have been written on that note if it had been real. It was probably a cry for help, and the scuffle was only meant to get that note into my pocket. Maybe I’ve watched too many movies like that.

Anyway, let’s continue with the theme that someone needs help but apparently can’t ask for it openly. In my work, I don’t encounter that so directly – people with a security issue simply ask for advice; sometimes even when they suspect the expected answer will mean extra work or require them to abandon their current way of working. Fortunately, colleagues usually understand the importance of security measures.

Outside of my direct work, situations like that can certainly occur. Our organization has a huge impact on what you and I have in our wallets. But also on the profits of legal or illegal trade. And when it comes to money, crime is always lurking. That doesn’t always mean people spontaneously start doing criminal things. But because we manage an insane amount of data about everything and everyone, professional criminals sometimes set their sights on our employees.

Here’s a snippet from an NOS news report dated August 20: "An Amsterdam municipal official who is in custody on suspicion of corruption and complicity in explosions has sold data on a large scale to criminals, according to the Public Prosecution Service. Those criminals then carried out attacks or caused explosions at dozens of addresses he had provided."

It seems this official independently set up a little business selling addresses. However, often it works the other way around: people with access to certain data are approached by criminals. And that doesn’t always happen in a straightforward way. No, often they first try to become friends, and maybe at some point they help you with something. They’re looking for a weak spot in you, something you could really use help with. And you get that help from your new friend. A little while later, a small favor is asked. "Look at this, someone hit my car! Luckily, I just managed to note the license plate. The police are too busy to look into it, but for the insurance I really need to know who that jerk is. Hey, you have access to that kind of information, you’ll help me out, right?"

They’ll probably come back to you more often, and then you can’t get out of it. You’ve done something that you shouldn’t have, and now you’re stuck. You don’t want to pass on information anymore, but your new ‘friend’ won’t accept that. If you don’t help him anymore, your boss might find out what you’ve done…

That situation may seem hopeless, but help is always available. And luckily, you don’t have to appear in my dreams for that. There are various internal channels you can turn to. Look for information on subversive crime. Do something before it’s truly too late. And for the vast majority who are not affected by this: remember that you never know who will cross your path in the future.


And in the big bad world...

2025-07-25

Artificial Integrity

Picture AI-generated (Copilot)

High time for a summery blog, although the inspiration doesn’t come from the current weather. Fortunately, a colleague gave me a great tip.

He showed me two short videos. The first one shows him and his girlfriend sitting next to each other. They turn toward each other and kiss. In the second video, he’s alone on a rock by the sea, and four blonde, long-haired, and rather scantily clad women slide into view and, well, caress him. He lifts his head in delight.

Why does he share that footage? We don’t have a team culture where we brag about such conquests. No, he showed me this because it’s not real. Oh, it starts with a real photo, just a nice vacation snapshot. Then the AI app PixVerse turns it into a video. You can choose from a whole range of templates—far more than the two examples mentioned: you can have someone board a private jet, cuddle with a polar bear or tiger, turn into Batman, have your hair grow explosively, get slapped in the face, and so on. With many of these videos, viewers will immediately realize they’re fake. But with my colleague’s videos, it’s not so obvious.

That’s exactly why the European AI Act requires that content created by artificial intelligence be labeled as such. Imagine if his girlfriend saw the second video without any explanation. Depending on temperament and mutual trust, that could easily lead to a dramatic scene. PixVerse is mainly aimed at having fun, but you can imagine how such tools could be used for very different purposes.

Take blackmail, for instance. You generate a video of someone in a compromising situation, threaten to release it, and hold out your hand. And like any good criminal, they won’t necessarily follow the law and label it as fake. Now, PixVerse’s quality isn’t immediately threatening: if you look closely, you can tell. Fingers remain problematic for AI, and eyes too. But still, if you’re not expecting to be fooled, you won’t notice—and you only see it once you’re looking for it. I see a criminal business model here.

It seems PixVerse mainly targets young people, judging by the free templates available. My colleague’s videos were also made by a child. On the other hand, you can subscribe to various plans, ranging from €64.99 to €649.99 per year. That’s well above pocket money level for most. If you do get a subscription, the watermark disappears from your videos—in other words, no more hint that AI was involved.

One of the pillars of information security is integrity: the accuracy and completeness of data. This was originally conceived with databases and other computer files in mind. It would be wrong if a house number or amount would be incorrect or if data would be missing. But you can easily apply this principle to images and audio, too. If you can no longer trust them, integrity is no longer guaranteed. Not to mention the (personal) integrity of those who abuse it.

After this blog, my vacation begins, and I used AI to help plan it. For example, to find nice overnight stops on the way to our final destination. But you have to stay alert: ChatGPT claimed the distance between two stops was over a hundred kilometers less than what Google Maps calculated. When confronted, ChatGPT admitted it had measured as the crow flies. I’d call that artificially dumb rather than intelligent.

I hope you encounter something during your own vacation that makes you think: he should write a blog about that. Write it down or take a photo and send it to me! As long as it’s real…

The Security (b)log will return after the summer holidays.


And in the big bad world ...

 

2025-03-21

Number 2

Image from Pixabay

“Up for number 2? Please do it at home, because our toilet gets clogged quickly.”

On our way home from a short vacation we stopped at a cafeteria close to home, because we had no food in the house. And there, on the otherwise neat toilet, I spotted that note. The text reminded me of Belgian roads. Instead of repairing the sometimes abominable road surface, they put a sign next to it: degraded road.

Of course, placing a sign is much cheaper than fixing the problem. At least, at first glance. Perhaps hungry guests will avoid this cafeteria in the future, because after a long walk in the area they still have to go somewhere with their number 2 before they eat their fries. That means loss of turnover. And in Belgium, cars wear out faster. Moreover, I can imagine that a bad road surface causes more accidents: you lose control of the steering wheel when you drive through a pothole, or you try to avoid the pothole and collide with another car. All of that causes extra costs, and perhaps even human suffering.

And if our southern neighbours were to halve the excessive lighting of the country's roads, wouldn't they have any money left to repair those same roads? That's a bit more complicated. My physics teacher from a long time ago once explained why the Belgians have so many street lamps. That was due to the construction of nuclear power stations. They gave the country overcapacity. You have to go somewhere with that electricity, and that's why all those lamps were planted. Even then, there was already talk of grid congestion; the generated electricity had to be used up immediately. By the way, I have no idea whether that argument still holds true decades later, but I always liked this fascinating - because unexpected - connection.

If you have a problem, you want to solve it. For example, by removing the cause. If that isn’t possible, because you have no influence on it, you can take measures to compensate for the negative consequences. And if that isn’t possible either, for example because you do not have the money for it, then… Well, then you can always put up warning signs.

An example where it is difficult to remove the cause is cybercrime. Sure, these criminals are arrested with some regularity – just like their analogue colleagues – but there are simply too many of them and they often operate from safe foreign countries, where the Dutch strong arm has little control over them (although there are rare cases known in which the Russian justice system cooperated with foreign requests for assistance, for example in the case in which a meter-long file, translated into Russian, was delivered to Moscow).

Because eliminating the cause is so difficult, we have all kinds of measures to detect and neutralize malicious actions. Think of virus scanners, mail filters and people who keep an eye on things. But because all that is not enough, we have to ask everyone to be alert. Phishing is the number 1 point of attention, because one wrong mouse click can ruin an entire organization. That sounds dramatic, but it’s still true. And there are more subjects that all users need to know something about to ensure healthy business operations.

Fortunately, there is a hunger for information about this. In the coming period, I will again be a guest speaker at various organizational units that have asked me to treat their employees to a presentation. I always ask the organizers what is on their minds, what they want to hear about. Such a conversation sometimes provides surprising insights into the success of awareness efforts. Like earlier this week, when I spoke to a colleague about a presentation in their team. The team members are loyal readers of the Security (b)log. Nevertheless, even there, very occasionally someone forgets to lock their workstation when they walk away for a moment. And then their colleagues shout: “Oh, if Patrick sees this…!” It is nice to see that the message is getting across.

 

And in the big bad world…

 

2025-02-14

From Asia with love

Image from Unsplash

They didn't mention it in the eight o'clock news, but the fact that the report was broadcast on the eve of Valentine's Day could hardly be a coincidence. It was about a man who got in touch with a certain Julia on this dating app. Could this finally be the one for him?

They chatted for a while, and after a few days Julia wrote: “Guess what I was just doing!” And she sent a screenshot of an impressive graph, showing that she had just made a lot of money trading cryptocurrencies. And she was quite willing to explain to our anonymous love seeker how that worked. So he received a link to a trading app. But he didn’t realize that he had fallen into the hand of scammers. Nothing was traded via that app. His entire investment – first a thousand euros, then ten thousand, a total of one hundred fifty thousand – disappeared straight into criminal pockets. When the thugs realized that there was nothing left to be gained, Julia abruptly ended the budding romance. Our Romeo found himself in a difficult time, in which he lost confidence in everyone – including himself.

In many presentations I give, there is this folk wisdom: if something seems too good to be true, it usually is. It once started with that Nigerian prince, who sent you of all people an email, promising you mountains of gold if you helped him free up a large sum of money. Lawyers from faraway countries, who told you that a large inheritance was waiting for you, were a variation on that. The only occasion when I believe a statement like that is when it is on a chance card in Monopoly. But the scams are becoming increasingly shrewd and the criminals are putting more time and effort into getting the loot. Where that prince used to target a large group in one go, hoping that a few people might fall for it, they are now investing in a good relationship with the individual victim.

The news also showed where all that misery is coming from. No longer mainly from Nigeria and the surrounding area, but from Southeast Asia. From there, some thirty scam centers operate: apartment buildings full of Julias, who together have already earned some 75 billion dollars from people who were too gullible. Many of those approximately three hundred thousand Julias do that work involuntarily. They have been lured there by human traffickers under false pretenses. They live in captivity and if they don’t perform well, they receive corporal punishment.

Last week’s blog included a link to an article saying that Thailand had cut off internet and power to the border region with Myanmar in an attempt to cripple the scam centers. That shows how powerless you really are in the fight against criminals operating from a country that doesn’t put the slightest obstacle in their way. The article didn’t say anything about the extent to which the scam centers were dependent on Thai services, but by now they will have found a way to continue operating. That probably doesn’t apply to innocent citizens and businesses in the border region, who have also been affected by this well-intentioned measure.

Cybercrime in this form is only possible thanks to technology that was never conceived with this purpose in mind. With the help of translation services such as Google Translate, Julia was able to chat with her victim in perfect Dutch. Artificial intelligence is also increasingly being used for evil. I will once again make the comparison with dynamite: when Alfred Nobel invented it in the 19th century , he did not foresee that it would be used to blow up bank vaults and soldiers. And dating apps were also not set up as a platform for crime with a romantic prelude.

If the crime is not tackled, then its potential victims must be made resilient. Unlike a street robbery, you do have a chance to escape from those fraudulent practices. It is actually quite simple: if a new contact suddenly brings up money as a topic, you have to be careful. Take off your rose-colored glasses and look at what is happening through a magnifying glass. Discuss your doubts with someone you have trusted for years; not with Julia, because she knows all sorts of ways to reassure you. Just say firmly that you are not interested. You are using that dating app to find love, not to get rich.

If necessary, print out that piece of folk wisdom and hang it above your screen.

 

And in the big bad world…

 

2024-07-04

Crime from the holodeck

 

Image from Pixabay

You walk through a corridor that looks like all the other corridors, but eventually you stand in front of that one door. It whizzes open with that typical sound and you enter the room behind it. But no, you are no longer in a room at all. You are in a lush forest, hearing birds chirping and a stream babbling. And yet you really haven't walked outside, for the simple reason that you are on board a spaceship.

Some of the readers fully understand what I am talking about, others will hopefully also continue to read with curiosity. For the latter group, an explanation: you are on board a spaceship from Star Trek, the still popular science fiction series from deep into the last century, where in the 24th century they have the holodeck: a room in which holograms and force fields generate simulations of people, objects and environments. It all looks, feels, sounds and smells completely realistic and you can even touch things. The holodecks are mainly used for recreation and training purposes. The simulated environment can appear much larger than the space occupied by the holodeck. That's why you can walk through that forest for hours. But you could just as easily sit in a virtual cafe or play a game of tennis.

In the 1980s, when the holodeck appeared in Star Trek, this was an example of virtual reality avant la lettre. Only in the following decade did consumer versions of VR headsets become widespread – you know, those ski goggles with built-in screens and preferably speakers on the side, which immerse you in a sometimes frighteningly realistic illusion. You have to experience it to understand it.

As often happens with inventions that advance humanity, the technology to create virtual realities (a contradiction in terms if you ask me) has also been put to bad use. Because nowadays we have artificial intelligence (also a term with a built-in contradiction). AI is used by cybercriminals to present a false reality to their victims. Like that mother I was talking about a while ago, who really thought she heard her son on the phone saying that he had had an accident. You don't always have to set up a complete environment like a holodeck to get someone to believe something. Sometimes it's just a matter of showing, making it heard, felt or smelled what fits in a certain context. And criminals are particularly useful at this.
I call that AI crime.

If you regularly read the articles in the And in the big bad world... section below, you will have seen many events lately that will promote AI crime: a Brit who - if elected to the House of Commons – lets himself be controlled by AI, a student who has applied AI to cheat, 'intelligent' toothbrushes and other household appliances, and especially not to forget AI functions that are increasingly being built into everyday software.

Will you still be able to distinguish between fake and real? Is your perception complete? Already in the era of chemical photography (film, darkroom, chemicals) the truth was violated by retouching photos. Often to make them more attractive, but there are also group photos of important Soviet Union people in which disgraced comrades have been erased. They have been cancelled, we would say nowadays. With digital photos, photoshopping is a piece of cake. And you've probably seen portraits that claim to be AI-generated. Had you not been given that information, you probably would have thought you were looking at a real human being. And the same goes with sound: the criminal obtains a recording of someone saying something and then his AI application can make the same voice say something different. This can also be achieved analogously: in presentations I often show a video in which you think you see and hear the actor Morgan Freeman - the visual part is indeed made with AI, but the voice is 'simply' deepfaked by a voice actor.

Virtual reality and artificial intelligence form a fertile couple. If you put their abbreviations together, you get vrai. That is the French word for truth, or reality. Isn’t that bizarre?

 

And in the big bad world...

... unfortunately I didn't have time to fill this section this time due to a day off.

2024-06-28

Who can harm you?

 

Image from Pixabay

Brrr-iiiing ... According to ChatGPT, that's a good onomatopoeia of a passing scooter. But that's besides the point; I will definitely write more about artificial intelligence, but for now it's about that scooter. Because it shouldn't pass me at all in that place.

I’ll explain. Our neighborhood is intersected by various cycle paths, which offer you a shorter route than if you used the normal road network. A large part of these cycle paths have a rectangular blue sign with the text 'cycle path'. That is traffic sign G13 of the Dutch traffic regulations, and it means that you can walk and cycle there. You have no business there with a scooter with a combustion engine (unless the engine is off). You guess where this is going: that sign is ignored en masse by scooterists. When another one of those cracked by recently and we were talking about it, my wife said: “Well, who's going to hurt you?” And indeed: the police and the municipality point the finger at each other and it’s already six years ago that the Cyclists' Union mentioned a municipal trial elsewhere in the city with signs reading 'prohibited for scooters', which we would have to wait for. I am still waiting.

Who can actually harm you if you do things that are not allowed in the cyber domain? Many things happen there that are a lot more intense than riding your scooter on a G13 cycle path. We are talking about cyber criminals who use their technical knowledge and/or skills to dishonestly obtain money or goods. These are the people who send you a text message about a package that could not be delivered, with a link that takes you to a fake website, where they ask for data with which they then digitally rob you. Or those that shut down hospitals with ransomware, putting healthcare services at serious risk, as recently happened in London. That appears to be a case of hacktivism, by the way: Qilin , the gang behind this attack, claims the attack is revenge for British government activities in an unspecified war (but we all know it's about Ukraine). Qilin also says they are sorry that patients are suffering from the attack but that it is not their fault. That stupid statement makes me angry.

Whether someone can harm the cybercriminal depends on two factors: how good they are at digital hide-and-seek, and where they live. Both of these factors are also linked. If you live in a civilized world, you have to erase your digital traces very carefully to prevent the police from showing up on your doorstep sooner or later. On the other hand, if you live in a country where they see cybercrime as normal work, as long as you do not target citizens of your own country, then you have little to fear. Yes, occasionally reports come out about the arrest of a Russian hacker, but the vast majority can go about their business freely and live in luxury. Some Russian malware even checks whether a computer to be attacked has a Cyrillic keyboard installed and if so, they leave it alone.

State actors (a fancy term for cybercriminals who work on behalf of a government) are also joining the fray. You can carry out a ransomware attack and make it look like you're in it for money, while the actual goal of that government is to take a company or agency offline for a while, or to steal their secrets - because that has been an additional function of ransomware for several years. It is often used as an additional threat: we will publish the captured data if you do not pay. But perhaps that data is also intended for their own use. There are also state actors who commit cybercrime to obtain foreign exchange. According to the UN, North Korea has raked in three billion dollars in six years.

And then there is that newspaper headline in the Dutch newspaper Het Parool from early last year: “Very young hackers did not come from Russia or North Korea, but from Zandvoort” (which is a town on the North Sea coast). They didn’t hide well enough, whilst living in a country where the police do go after cyber criminals and also play a leading role internationally.

Young people can playfully drift into crime, sometimes not even realizing that they are crossing a line. Parents often think that their teenager is just gaming. Both parents and their offspring must be made more aware of legislation in this area, and see to it that the available talents are used in a legal manner. If you don't know that something is not allowed, you don't feel guilty.

Which brings me back to those scooters. Older generations, who received their scooter license for free with their car driver license, may never have learned that G13 sign and therefore do not know that they are not allowed to drive there. But all those young people, they have to know that sign because they had to study for their license, right? Do they not see the sign along the road, or do they simply ignore it? Because, who can harm you?

 

And in the big bad world...

 

2023-10-27

Tech support scam

 

Image from Pixabay

Cry for help from the audience: “Help, I've been fooled!” In such a case I listen to both ears: the left one listens to hear how I can help, the right one listens to see if there’s a story that could be useful to others. Both ears got their money's worth. In this case, the person in question (let's call him Bert) already asked if I wanted to write a blog about it, otherwise I would have asked if he was okay with that.

Let me paint the picture. Bert had an old, slow PC at home on which he wanted to install the new version of his virus scanner. That didn't work out. That's why he wanted to go to the supplier's site and find a solution. He googled the name of his virus scanner, clicked on the top result and ended up at the requested site. Shortly afterwards a chat popped up: we have noticed a problem on your computer and we would like to help you.

Yes please, Bert replied; After all, he was on that site because he indeed had a problem. In order to be helped, he had to install a program (GoToAssist) to let the friendly helper look at Bert's computer. That's what Bert did. A viewing program (remote support) like that often lets the helper take over the computer, allowing him to get things done; You probably know that from your work. A moment later, the directory tree of Bert's computer scrolled across the screen, and suddenly everything turned red. Oh dear! A few thousand Trojan horses had been found!

A Trojan horse is a specific type of computer virus. Bert rightly asked why they had not been intercepted by his virus scanner. That's because the company's standard scanner doesn't detect Trojan horses at all, the helpdesk employee replied. But luckily she was able to offer Bert an extra program that would fill in the gap. They had subscriptions available for 1, 2 and 5 years, for just a few hundred euros.

At this point – about half an hour into the chat – Bert smelled a rat. He asked the helpdesk how he could be sure he was really chatting with someone from the antivirus company. There was no clear answer, after which Bert terminated the connection and, on the advice of his sister, who he was now on the phone with, pulled the network cable from the PC.

What had happened here? To begin with, Bert had not ended up on the real site of his supplier at all. Criminals recreate websites and ensure that they end up at the top of the search results. Almost no one looks closely at the address (URL) in a search result, so if it says you're going to virusscanner.com, it's easy to miss that you're actually going to viruscanner.com. When Bert ended up on the fake site, the criminal started a chat and tricked Bert into installing that remote support program. Once inside, he put some windows on the screen, made lines turn red and put a fake message about Trojans on the screen. His goal was to scare Bert and trick him into buying a "solution".

It is nonsense that Bert's virus scanner would not recognize Trojan horses. The idea that his computer would be home to an entire cavalry: just the same. But in the meantime, Bert felt bad. What has that criminal done? Maybe he stole files? Bert stores his photos and other important files on an external hard drive, which fortunately he disconnected at the beginning of the chat.

I discussed a number of scenarios with Bert. Perhaps the criminal copied Bert's email address book in order to present himself to Bert's contacts with insider knowledge or perhaps even to pose as Bert. Bert was smart enough to inform his closest contacts about this immediately after the incident and to impress on them that they should be on guard for strange messages. Another possibility is that the criminal wanted to copy photos and documents and then threaten Bert with publication. Fortunately, those files were inaccessible on the disconnected external drive. But the most likely scenario for me is that the criminal was only looking to make Bert pay for the Trojan horse killer offered. It came with a hefty price tag and is the easiest way to get money. The other scenarios require more from the criminal.

It makes sense that Bert is still not completely comfortable with the situation. I advised him to first run his old virus scanner on the disconnected PC. Step two is to re-connect the PC to the internet and run a free online virus scan (google 'online virus scan'). If that is all negative, Bert can also connect his hard drive and give it the same treatment. Finally, I suggested using a search engine other than Google, for example Startpage or DuckDuckGo . But to be honest, that is mainly for privacy reasons. Whichever you use: I prefer not to click on the sponsored search results, but to scroll through to the web results. Good luck, Bert!

 

And in the big bad world...

This section contains a selection of news articles I came across in the past week. Because the original version of this blog post is aimed at readers in the Netherlands, it contains some links to articles in Dutch. Where no language is indicated, the article is in English.

 

2023-06-30

The King of Doodles

 

Image from author

It was a year ago, in a conference room in Utrecht. A strange room it was, because one of the walls consisted almost entirely of large shutters – on the inside that is. I still don't really know what was hiding behind those shutters. But that's not the point. The point is that I sat next to the King of Doodles. And that I wanted to do something with that in my blog, but couldn't find a link with security. Until now.

A doodle, as explained by Wikipedia, is a drawing made while a person's attention is otherwise occupied. You know, like someone is sitting in a meeting with a writing pad on the table and they’re drawing all kinds of frills on it: doodles. Well, that colleague I was sitting next to at the time, boy was he skilled at that. He scribbled like his life depended on it - that's why I crowned him the King of Doodles for myself. And I watched with fascination. What was also fascinating was that the drawing didn't seem to distract him in the slightest: he just joined the conversation, with a lot of sensible input in fact.

Recently, the same meeting took place again. Again in Utrecht, but now in a different place, without indoor shutters. The King of Doodles was there again, and he was scribbling as usual. We talked about it during a break, and I confessed that I had been wanting to blog about this spectacle for a year, but couldn't find the right hook. And that ate at me, because, as regular readers know, I can usually give the craziest observations such a twist that they suddenly have a connection to my profession. Only those cursed doodles, they resist my urge to write. Until another colleague looked at the drawing and casually said: “That looks like a QR code.” I looked at him in bewilderment: that was it! There is a lot to write about QR codes from my profession.

QR codes can no longer be ignored in everyday life. You come across them everywhere. “Scan me!” they shout to unsuspecting passers-by, “I'll give you information!” They are often featured on pamphlets and advertisements. If you want more information after reading it, you can do so by scanning that QR code. But you sometimes come across QR codes separately. On a sticker that someone just put on a traffic light, for example. Or on a shop window. They are much more mysterious.

The problem with QR codes is that we humans cannot read them. So you have no idea where such a code will take you. It can just contain a link to www.scammers.com (this domain name is still available, by the way). In my memory, it used to work that if you scanned a QR code, you immediately went to the linked website. That is now different (better): a pop-up shows you the destination and then you can still decide whether you want to go there. But then you often don't know much – or do you have any idea if something like s5.productinfo.com is a bona fide site?

Now you don't have to worry immediately that a QR code next to a recipe in your supermarket’s magazine will take you to a rogue site that steals your data or provides your device with a nice virus. However, I'd be a bit more careful with QR codes that you come across in the wild that have no context. Or with codes on advertising posters or shops. They have context, but maybe someone has pasted their own code over them; then you think you are going to fineshop.com but you still end up at scammers.com.

My advice: make conscious use of QR codes. See if you understand where they're going, and if that doesn't seem right, or you don't have a clear context (like with that yummy recipe), better back off. You can always google it by hand to get more information on the subject in question.

At those Utrecht meetings I mentioned, our internal bloggers and the intranet editors met. The editors treated us to lunch and figures that showed that our blogs are important crowd pullers. But for me, the most important thing was that I can finally feature my esteemed fellow blogger, the King of Doodles, in my blog.

The Security (b)log returns after the summer holidays.

 

And in the big bad world…

 

Vacuum cleaners and toothbrushes

Image:  allthegearnoskill Just under two months ago I heard two news items on the same day, and both caught my attention. One was about a ro...