2024-02-09

Kafka upside down

 

Image from Pixabay

Last summer I visited countries where I do not speak the language. In some countries I couldn't even read the writing. In one of those countries I bought a backpack with a card attached to it. “ATTENTION!” it said on the front. But the back was printed with characters that I wasn’t able to interpret.

Thanks to the wonderful technology of Google Lens, I was able to find out what was so urgently requiring my attention. It says that the backpack may become discolored, that I should avoid washing and ironing, that I should use “accessories such as closures, hooks, buttons, metal fittings, belt straps, buckles and rings” properly or they may break, and finally, that the product does not protect the contents in the event of a fall or impact; the manufacturer is especially concerned about my precision instruments, precious metals and fragile objects.

A couple of months ago, I asked you in the Security (b)log whether you know Franz Kafka's novel Der Prozess (The Trial). I assume you've read it by now. And then you may recognize a Kafkaesque trait in the text of that backpack card: you have to use the backpack accessories correctly, but it does not say what the correct way is. For me,  backpacks leave me sometimes wonder what that strap or loop is for, let alone whether I know how to use the thing properly. And it also strikes me as rather vague that I should 'avoid' something – what if I do it anyway? Admittedly, I wouldn't have thought of ironing a backpack, but my previous backpack regularly ended up in the washing machine (and it survived).

I'm not going to lecture you further about Kafka now. No, I'm going to turn Kafka upside down. In his novel you have to adhere to rules that you do not know and if you break those rules, you are punished. Kafka upside down is when you know the rules all too well and at the same time you know that if you stick to them, sooner or later something will happen that is very detrimental to you. What would you do if a law were introduced that required you to drive a car at a minimum speed of 100 km/h (62 mph) in built-up areas (and 50 km/h in a residential area)? Are you going to stick to this, even though you know for sure that in the best case scenario you will end up in the hospital, or will you accept,  for the sake of self-preservation, that you will be fined?

Earlier this week, intelligence services in the Netherlands revealed that Chinese state hackers hacked into a Defense network. They were able to enter through a known (!) vulnerability in American-made security equipment. Continuing to use something with a known vulnerability is like knowing that the left headlight of your car is not working, but still driving in the dark - because replacing the light yourself is no longer possible in many modern cars, the garage is already closed and you really have to go somewhere. And you continue to use that network equipment the same way, because, well, you need that network anyway and you can't easily replace it. Regardless of the question of whether another product is completely safe.

I don't know how they figured out that China is the culprit; attribution of cyber attacks is a difficult matter. Anyway, the report states that the intelligence services determined “with high confidence ” that it must have been China – spy talk for “we actually know for sure”. And it is not the first time that the West has pointed the finger at China in such cases. So we are more or less certain that China is spying on us.

If a Dutch government institution wants to purchase a service or product, it must follow the Public Procurement Act 2012: if the value of the contract exceeds a certain amount, a European tender must be carried out. So you cannot just go to a supplier and place your order. You must describe in a thick document what you need and what requirements you set for it. You cannot “target” that document to a specific product by including requirements that you know only your favorite product meets. Companies from all over the EU may register for such a tender.

Suppose you are a government service and you want to, say, purchase cell phones. There are Chinese mobile phones on the market that meet all your requirements and they are cheaper than the competition's products. There is a good chance that European companies will offer those Chinese mobile phones. The competitive pricing forces you to do business with that company. The contractor may be little more than a box pusher who outsources technical support to the manufacturer. And before you know it, you not only have Chinese equipment in your organisation, but also the accompanying Chinese personnel. Both the equipment and the maintenance technician may do things that were not included in your package of requirements, but are included in those of the Chinese government.

You dutifully complied with all the rules, but in doing so you brought in the Trojan horse with full consciousness. That's Kafka, upside down.

 

And in the big bad world...

This section contains a selection of news articles I came across in the past week. Because the original version of this blog post is aimed at readers in the Netherlands, it contains some links to articles in Dutch. Where no language is indicated, the article is in English.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The invisible king

Image from Pixabay His Majesty the King has been pleased to honor us with a visit. Although I myself had a meeting at the office yesterday, ...